this is indeed the general case, also in my journal. To avoid such conflicts of interest, Nature requires potential referees to disclose any professional and commercial competing interests before undertaking to review a paper, and requires referees not to copy papers or to circulate them to un-named colleagues. ISSN 1546-1726 (online) Natures editors are unable to assign high priority to consideration of appeals. 9.3 weeks. In [i] we find started associated with past time in [a] but with future time in [b], as indicated by the temporal modifiers yesterday and tomorrow respectively. //-->Manuscript received)->Editor assigned->Manuscript under consideration->Editor Decision StartedDecision sent to author->Waiting for revision, ->Revision receivedManuscript #A1Manuscript under submission->Manuscript received->Editor assigned->Manuscript under consideration->Editor Decision Started, . Special care is given to papers whose authors native language is not English, and special attention is given to summary paragraphs. This implies that the scope of the work does not meet international standards and capacity in the journal's . Status has been "Ready for decision" for 25 days. Was your paper accepted? My experiences with these journals have not been this positive. To borrow a phrase that Bertolt Brecht originally wrote about science itself, the chief aim of our appeals process is not to open a door to infinite wisdom, but to set a limit to infinite error., Decisions, decisions. Thank you for visiting nature.com. Learn more about Stack Overflow the company, and our products. resubmitnoveltyresubmit, 4. The first step in making the right decision is recognizing the problem or opportunity and deciding to address it. Subscribe and get curated content that will give impetus to your research paper. Naturepapers are assigned to a print issue two weeks before publication, at which time authors will receive an e-mail notifying them of their scheduled print publication date. In light of such uncertainty, the threshold for reversing a decision must be set well above the level of 'noise' in the process: otherwise, decisions would simply go back and forth endlessly in a kind of Brownian motion. A group of my colleagues recently discussed scheduling about 25,000 words to 35,000 words per week for a typical edit, if there even is such a thing. New referees can often raise new sets of points, which complicates and lengthens the consideration process instead of simplifying it. I am faced with the same situation right now. Most respectable journals have a definite map designed since submission, first editoroial decision, review time, last editorial decision, Editing and publication. Full disclosure: Editage Insights is a product of Editage, a global provider of world-class scientific communication solutions. We would suggest that you wait for another 2 weeks before writing to the journal for an update. How do I align things in the following tabular environment? This website is using a security service to protect itself from online attacks. Natureuses a transparent peer review system, where for manuscripts submitted from February 2020 we can publish the reviewer comments to the authors and author rebuttal letters of published original research articles. Thanks! The best answers are voted up and rise to the top, Not the answer you're looking for? Please avoid repeating information that is already present in the abstract and introduction. Will contact my PI if it doesn't change to "decision sent to author" in the next few days. What does this mean and should I contact the editor? There are several actions that could trigger this block including submitting a certain word or phrase, a SQL command or malformed data. Is it fair to reject manuscript with few words of comments after long 9 months of review? If an author remains unsatisfied, he or she can write to the Editor, citing the manuscript reference number. n/a. I have experience with the manuscript submission process, from submission to peer review, to acceptance/rejection. [CDATA[> Your manuscript entitled "xxxxxxxxx" has now been seen again by our original reviewers, whose comments are appended below. All Nature editors report to the Editor of Nature, who sets Nature's publication policies. Is there a single-word adjective for "having exceptionally strong moral principles"? the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses. . Under these circumstances, the editors letter will state explicitly whether or not a resubmitted version would be considered. A decision by the editor in chief is the . Sometimes they are more busy. Although we hope that the peer review files will provide a detailed and useful view into our peer review process, it is important to note that these files will not contain all the information considered in the editorial decision making process, such as the discussions between editors, editorial decision letters, or any confidential comments made by reviewers or authors to the editors. In light of their advice, I am delighted to say that we can in principle offer to publish it in Nature, provided that you revise the paper to address a number of further editorial points. However, if it has not gone through peer review, but is directly showing the status awaiting final decision, then there is a possibility that your paper might be rejected after initial screening by the editor. the editor usually submits a brief comment on the article to the editor in chief who then has the final say and will make the decision available to you. One reason is because each referee sees only a tiny fraction of the papers submitted and is deeply knowledgeable about one field, whereas the editors, who see all the papers submitted, can have a broader perspective and a wider context from which to view the paper. PIs gone AWOL? Authors are free to discuss their paper with the media from six days before the publication date, and are asked to ensure that Nature Research's embargo conditions are understood by journalists and others. Editors will not send resubmitted papers to the reviewers if it seems that the authors have not made a serious attempt to address all the referees criticisms. A referee might be selected for expertise in only one area, for example to judge if a statistical analysis is appropriate, or if a particular technique that is essential to underpin the conclusion has been undertaken properly. Additionally, for help with writing to the journal, you may find this handbook useful: How to communicate with the journal? Wishing you the best of luck on your paper. the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in English Editing - Editage.com | Editage.jp | Editage.co.kr |SCI Editage.cn |publicao de artigos Editage.com.br | Editage.com.tw |Terms of UseforEnglish Editing Services. edit: so no. Others must fail.. Is it possible to create a concave light? Can airtags be tracked from an iMac desktop, with no iPhone? The judgement about which papers will interest a broad readership is made by Nature's editors, not its referees. I am currently continuing at SunAgri as an R&D engineer. Hope that helps. Answer (1 of 4): Hi! We oversee this process to ensure that your manuscript contains everything our editors and peer reviewers need to perform a fair and thorough assessment of your work. Editage Insights is funded by Editage and endorses services provided by Editage but is editorially independent. How long should I wait for a response from the journal? 9.3 weeks. Languages English Espaol Portugus Research Creative My Account Submit My Manuscript It doesnt mean anything other than the editor has started to look at your paper. Sorry we couldn't be helpful. The Academic Editor being consulted will be asked to provide an advisory recommendation on the manuscript and may recommend acceptance, further peer-review, or uphold the original rejection decision. //--> If the journal lowers its threshold for publication, its reputation will decline, devaluing the achievements of thousands of previously accepted authors. In my experience rejection is quite rapid - 48 hours or so. Finally, despite persistent beliefs to the contrary, we do not base our decisions on the reputations of the authors or their friends, and so we do not respond favorably to 'celebrity endorsements' or statements about authors' previous track records. //--> How do I write an inquiry to the editor about my manuscript's current status? Follow. Most journals typically take around 4-12 weeks to share their final decision. One perk, however, is having the choice and control over what I . If your article is accepted, it could take anywhere from a few months to three years for the journal to publish your piece. Most papers are sent to two or three referees, but some are sent to more or, occasionally, just to one. Nature editors will normally honour requests that a paper not be sent to one or two (but no more) competing groups for review. Thus, in rejecting an appeal, we do not intend to imply that our initial decision was flawless, only that the arguments for reconsideration were not sufficiently convincing to exceed the deliberately high threshold for reversing a decision. In addition, most authors are genuinely excited about their work, and usually submit to Nature Neuroscience because they believe that the paper deserves high-profile publication. If Nature declines to publish a paper and does not suggest resubmission, authors are strongly advised to submit their paper for publication elsewhere. AE stands for Associate Editor. This stage includes checks on authorship, competing interests, ethics approval and plagiarism. It's true that editorial rejections can be very rapid based on scope and perceived 'gee whiz' factor. Nature (Nature) It stated 'Under consideration' until today, when it changed to 'Decision made,' and then back to 'Under consideration.' on 07 Apr, 2021, This content belongs to the Journal submission & peer review Stage. We suggest that authors send proofs to co-authors for them to check, but request that changes among the co-authors are coordinated so that only one author communicates with Nature and only one set of corrections is sent. We understand your anxiety :-) However, the decision on manuscript acceptance depends on several factors, such as availability and responsiveness of peer reviewers and the extent of revisions recommended. Read Editage Insights in your favorite RSS Reader. In replying to the referees comments, authors are advised to use language that would not cause offence when their paper is shown again to the referees, and to bear in mind that if a point was not clear to the referees and/or editors, it is unlikely that it would be clear to the nonspecialist readers of Nature. Stage 2: Editor assigned. . What Is the Difference Between 'Man' And 'Son of Man' in Num 23:19? youre still in the running. 1) After submission, the system shows that Manuscript under consideration, which means that it is being evaluated by the editor; 2) If the latest status becomes Editor decision started, it means it has been sent for review (you can also check whether there is reviewer.zip in the file list, if yes, it means it is sent At each stage, the editor will discuss the manuscript with editorial colleagues in the light of referees reports, and send a letter to the author offering one of the following options: Editors letters also contain detailed guidance about the papers format and style where appropriate (see below), which should be read in conjunction with the manuscript formatting guide when revising and resubmitting. The Editor-in-Chief (EiC) makes the final decision on manuscript, with the associate editor (AE) making the initial decision. PRX editors make every effort to arrive at a clear decision on the disposition of a manuscript within a reasonable time. 3 weeks is pretty long for this. However, because the number of appeals has been growing to the point that it threatens to overwhelm our editorial resources, we have recently implemented a new system for considering them. edit: so no. The "Decision Started" status implies that peer review for your manuscript has been completed and the journal . Theoretically Correct vs Practical Notation. [CDATA[// >